Undeterred Press undeterredpress.com
Peer-reviewed · Published in days, not months

Rigorous Inquiry.
Independent Voice.

The prose-production bottleneck excluded practitioners, non-native English speakers, independent scholars, and thinkers whose ideas outran their writing — not for lack of original thought, but for lack of infrastructure. Undeterred Press exists because that infrastructure is no longer scarce. Every article is peer-reviewed on the strength of its thinking, and every article discloses exactly how it was made.

Where the idea is the credential.

Same rigor. A fraction of the wait.

Traditional peer review is slow because of queueing and editorial cycles — not because ideas take that long to check.

TRADITIONAL JOURNAL
18
months, on average
Submission queue → sequential review rounds → revise-and-resubmit → editorial decision
VS
UNDETERRED PRESS
18
days, on average
On-call reviewer pool → single rigorous round → published with full disclosure. Actual time depends on revision needs and researcher response time.
Issue 1 · Founding Article
ECONOMICS & PUBLIC POLICY

Ten Years Hence

Business Angel Tax Credits, the Absent Employment Lift, and a Decade of Convergent Evidence

A null finding on angel investor tax credits and employment, produced in a 2016 doctoral dissertation and never placed in a form the literature could cite. In 2023, the Journal of Finance reached the same conclusion through an independent methodology and a different dataset. The idea was a decade ahead of its production infrastructure. This is the article that infrastructure was missing.

Read the Article
Standards

Every article discloses its AI involvement.

The intellectual contribution is the contribution — original, evidence-grounded, rigorously argued, regardless of production method. The production method is disclosed anyway, on every piece, because provenance is a standard, not a stigma.

LEVEL 1

No AI involvement

Argument, evidence, and prose are entirely human-generated, start to finish.

LEVEL 2

AI-assisted

AI assisted research, organization, or drafting, with substantial human authorship. Findings and core analysis remain human-originated and independently verified.

LEVEL 3

AI-primary drafting

AI-primary drafting, with human direction throughout. The author verifies every claim and holds full intellectual responsibility for the result.

Scope

Undeterred Press does not accept clinical, diagnostic, or treatment-efficacy content — medical, pharmacological, or otherwise — where an erroneous claim could lead to direct physical harm. This is a single-editor outlet without a clinical review board, and no disclosure standard substitutes for the institutional infrastructure that kind of claim requires. Health policy and health-economics research fall within scope; treatment and diagnostic claims do not.

How it works

Submission to publication

01

Submit

Your idea, your argument — with an AI-disclosure statement attached.

02

Triage

An initial pass checks completeness and fit before a reviewer's time is spent.

03

Review

One rigorous round. A committed reviewer pool, not an open-ended queue.

04

Publish

Live within days, disclosure and review notes attached for full transparency.

"The gate that remains — the only gate that should have existed all along — is the quality of the thinking."

— Kevin A. Schulte, Ph.D., Founding Editorial

About

Independent by design.

Undeterred Press is an independent, peer-reviewed journal. No institutional affiliation, no publisher subsidy, no gatekeeping by pedigree — editorial judgment answers to the evidence and the argument, not to any parent institution.

Current Call for Papers

Issue 2: Open Call

Submissions welcome in public policy, economics, political economy, entrepreneurship, research methodology, and workplace learning & organizational development. Submission window to be announced.

Workplace learning & organizational development submissions reviewed with subject-matter support from Ann Schulte.

View Full CFP